As when reviewing declared contextual factors, the quality and impact of an applicant’s performance should be assessed objectively and on the same basis as other applicants.
Appropriate adjustments should be made to allow for a fair process so that those who have faced these additional barriers and submitted a COVID impact statement are considered on an even footing. Applicants are still expected to demonstrate the same standard (quality) as other applicants in terms of the excellence of their contribution; however, the quantity of their output/productivity might be adjusted in light of the COVID impact statement.
A holistic approach is encouraged by the Committees towards the assessment, taking into account both outputs from before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Appropriate adjustments should be made by the Committees to allow for a fair process so that those who have faced these additional barriers and submitted an impact assessment are considered on an even footing.
All metrics should be considered in context with other factors, to ensure that a balanced view is taken of the applicant’s overall contribution to research, teaching and service.